4. Required Section Moduli

PS8

We will need to use the following allowable limits:

f_{ci} is the maximum allowable compressive stress in the concrete immediately after transfer and prior to losses

(1)   \begin{equation*} f_{ci} =0.6f'_{ci} \end{equation*}

f_{ti} is  maximum allowable tensile stress in the concrete immediately after transfer and prior to losses

(2)   \begin{equation*} f_{ti} =3\sqrt{f'_{ci}} \end{equation*}

for simply supported members at the supports,

(3)   \begin{equation*} f_{ti} =6\sqrt{f'_{ci}} \end{equation*}

f_c is  maximum allowable compressive stress in the concrete after losses at service-load level

(4)   \begin{equation*} f_c = 0.45f_c \mbox { or } 0.6f_c \text {when allowed by the code}\end{equation*}

f_t is  maximum allowable tensile stress in the concrete after losses at service-load level

(5)   \begin{equation*} f_t =6\sqrt{f'_{c}} \end{equation*}

What has been left out in the simplified equations so far are the intermediate analysis checks that are required.  It has been mentioned on a couple of occasions so far, that there are two values for P (P_e and P_i).  There are a lot more values in between, but these two will govern.  It makes intuitive sense that if the beam is fully loaded, then the beam will deflect more, hence larger compressive and tensile (if present) stresses will result, if, the tendon force is P_e rather than P_i (P_e < P_i).  So, it is conservative to use the smaller  for a fully loaded (M_D + M_{SD} + M_L) condition (i.e. self-weight + superimposed dead load + live load).

However, what about at an intermediate loading stage, such as a time when there is more compression on the bottom fiber than the top fiber?  A realistic scenario could be that the beam is prestressed, and no load except the self-weight is applied.  Shrinkage and other factors have not yet occurred in the beam, so the tendon is still stressed to  P_i (not P_e) .

The more conservative value of P to use in this condition (M_D only) is to use P_i.

Let’s investigate this further:

PS9

By setting the expressions equal to f_{ti},f_{ci},f_c,f_t , as shown, we have enough information, just using geometry, to determine  that must be satisfied.

These expressions for S_t and S_b will be independent of P and e!

(6)   \begin{equation*} \Delta f^t = \left[\frac{-P}{A} \left(1-\frac{ec_t}{r^2}\right)- \frac{M_D}{S_t}\right] - \left[\frac{-\gamma P_i}{A} \left(1-\frac{ec_t}{r^2}\right)- \frac{M_D}{S_t}\right]  \end{equation*}

We can take the “\gamma” out of our second term, and rewrite the second term as

(7)   \begin{equation*} \gamma \left(\frac{-P_i}{A}\left(1-\frac{ec_t}{r^2}\right) - \frac{M_D}{S_t}\right) + \frac{\gamma M_D}{S_t} - \frac{M_D}{S_t} \mbox { or } \gamma(f_{ti}) + \frac{\gamma M_D}{S_t} - \frac{M_D}{S_t} \end{equation*}

So,

(8)   \begin{equation*} \Delta f^t = f_{ti} - \left[\gamma(f_{ti}) + \frac{\gamma M_D}{S_t} - \frac{M_D}{S_t}\right] = f_{ti} + \frac{M_D}{S_t} - \gamma(f_{ti}) - \frac{\gamma M_D}{S_t} = (1-\gamma)(f_{ti} + \frac{M_D}{S_t}) \end{equation*}

Similarly, skipping the work,

(9)   \begin{equation*} \Delta f_b = (1-\gamma)(-f_{ci} + \frac{M_D}{S_b}) \end{equation*}

So, regardless of the values of P and e, the DIFFERENCE in stresses after prestressing losses ONLY depends on material, geometry, and applied moment.

(f_{ci} is negative, so (-f_{ci}) is positive)

PS10

The “n” in f^t_n stands for “net”, and t designates “top”.

So, with f_{ti}, \Delta f^t positive, and f_c negative:

(10)   \begin{equation*} f^t_n = f_{ti} - \Delta f^t - f_c = f_{ti} - \left[(1-\gamma)(f_{ti} + \frac{M_D}{S_t})\right] - f_c \end{equation*}

(11)   \begin{equation*} f^t_n = f_{ti} - \left[f_{ti} + \frac{M_D}{S_t} - \gamma f_{ti} - \gamma\frac{M_D}{S_t}\right] - f_c = \gamma f_{ti} - (1-\gamma)\frac{M_D}{S_t} - f_c    (1)\end{equation*}

(f^t and \Delta f_b are positive and f_{ci} is negative)

PS11

(12)   \begin{equation*} f_{bn} = f_t - f_{ci} - \Delta f_b = f_t - f_{ci} - \left[(1 - \gamma)(-f_{ci} + \frac{M_D}{S_b})\right]\end{equation*}

(13)   \begin{equation*} f_{bn} = f_t - f_{ci}- \left[-f_{ci} + \frac{M_D}{S_b} + \gamma f_{ci} - \gamma \frac{M_D}{S_b}\right] = f_t - \gamma f_{ci} - (1-\gamma)\frac{M_D}{S_b}     (2) \end{equation*}

Again, we see that the DIFFERENCE in stresses between stages is independent of P and e

From inspection of the very first diagram, using what we know about the definitions of f^t_n and f_{bn} from the latter two diagrams, we can see that:

(14)   \begin{equation*} f^t_n = \frac{M_{SD}+M_L}{S_t}    (3) \end{equation*}

(15)   \begin{equation*} f_{bn} = \frac{M_{SD}+M_L}{S_b}    (4) \end{equation*}

(16)   \begin{equation*} (1) \rightarrow (3) \Rightarrow \mathbf {S_t \geq \frac{(1-\gamma)M_D + M_{SD} + M_L}{\gamma f_{ti} - f_c} = S_{t,min}} \end{equation*}

(17)   \begin{equation*} (2) \rightarrow (4) \Rightarrow \mathbf {S_b \geq \frac{(1-\gamma)M_D + M_{SD} + M_L}{\gamma f_t - f_{ci}} = S_{b,min}} \end{equation*}

These expressions assume that the stresses at both the transfer and service stages are largest at a single point along the beam – i.e. at midspan for a simply supported beam with draped tendons.

If S_t = S_{t,min} and S_b = S_{b,min}, then whatever P_i and e that cause f_{ti} and f_{ci} in the intermediate stage, will cause f_t and f_c at the full service load stage, when M_{SD} and M_L are added, and P_i becomes P_e. Any S_t and S_b>S_{t,min} and S_{b,min} are obviously conservative (i.e. P_i and e that cause f_{ti} and f_{ci} in the intermediate stage, would have stresses less than f_t and f_c at the full service load stage).

For a continuous beam, one would need to evaluate the above two expressions for the midspan and for the support (i.e. two sets of expressions) and use the largest set of values, keeping in mind that “S_t” is in fact \frac{I}{c_b} for a typical interior support and S_b would be \frac{I}{c_t} for the interior support. This is due to the fact that the applied loads would produce negative moment, and so the tendon would be draped so as to be located within the upper half of the section, at the interior supports.

The above two expressions would really only apply to a continuous beam in the circumstance where a single “set” of expressions controls (either at midspan or at the support). If, say, the midspan controls at transfer and the support controls at service loads, then the above expressions may either be too conservative or too aggressive. Regardless, the above equations are a good starting point, though rules-of-thumb are equally effective in some cases.

Note: the self-weight of the structure (M_D) depends on S, thus, the above equations aren’t perfect even for a simply supported beam with draped tensions, which is essentially the assumed geometry under which the above equations were derived.

For a simply supported span with straight tendons, most likely, the support stresses at the transfer stage would control at the transfer stage, and the midspan stresses would control at the service load stage. This is analogous to the scenario mentioned previously, regarding a continuous beam where the midspan controls at transfer and the support controls at service loads. For a continuous beam, developing new expressions for S_t and S_b would be cumbersome. For a simply supported beam with straight tendons, we can simply eliminate the M_D term from (1) and (2) since the stresses at the support at the transfer stage ONLY result from prestressing. The self-weight moment (and applied moments from gravity) is zero at the pinned supports. Stresses at midspan resulting from M_{TOT} are still assumed to govern at the service load stage, but (3) and (4) now include an M_D term, since the M_D terms no longer cancel.

Thus, we arrive at the following two expressions for a simply supported beam with straight tendons (often used in parking garages):

(18)   \begin{equation*} \mathbf {S_t \geq \frac{M_D + M_{SD} + M_L}{\gamma f_{ti} - f_c} = S_{t,min}} \end{equation*}

(19)   \begin{equation*} \mathbf{S_b \geq \frac{M_d + M{SD} + M_L}{f_t - \gamma f_{ci}} = S_{b,min}}\end{equation*}

These expressions assume that the stresses at transfer control at a point along the beam where there is no external moment and the stresses at service control at a different point along the beam, where there is moment – i.e. a simply supported beam with straight tendons.